Compliance Hub

Vanta alternatives: 10 best tools for it and security teams

Written by Iru Team | Aug 11, 2026, 6:54:33 PM

Running compliance at a scaling company means managing work that never really ends. Security questionnaires land without warning. Enterprise prospects want SOC 2 before the contract closes. Meanwhile, your ISO 27001 audit is only weeks away, and there's still evidence to collect, controls to validate, and documentation to update.

When your company was younger, the team handling all of this may have consisted of just one or two IT generalists with little formal GRC (governance, risk, and compliance) experience. While managing devices, user access, and everything else in the ticket queue, they turned to Vanta to automate evidence collection.

Now that your company has grown, you might need deeper control customization, support for additional frameworks, stronger risk management workflows, or a platform that connects compliance directly to device management and identity systems.

If that's where you're at, this data-backed guide covers 10 Vanta alternatives for teams scaling beyond their first SOC 2 and expanding into multiple compliance frameworks, including enterprise-grade GRC platforms that unify compliance, risk, and security operations across your organization.

What is Vanta?

Vanta is a compliance automation platform that helps companies achieve and maintain certifications like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and GDPR. It has 400+ integrations, automates control testing, and continuously collects evidence across cloud services, identity systems, and internal tools. The platform also includes policy management, vendor risk tracking, and an auditor portal to streamline audit collaboration and help teams establish and maintain audit readiness.

Vanta is typically a strong fit for organizations managing their first certifications or standardizing baseline compliance processes. However, many organizations find themselves upgrading when their compliance needs extend beyond automation-led audit readiness into broader governance and risk management.

10 alternatives to Vanta

Tool Best for Top feature G2 rating
Iru (formerly Kandji) Unified IT + compliance Compliance, endpoint management, and identity in one AI-powered platform 4.7/5
Drata Deep compliance automation 250+ integrations with enterprise-grade configurability 4.7/5
Secureframe Fast SOC 2 completion Streamlined onboarding built for SMBs without a dedicated GRC function 4.7/5
Sprinto Startup-speed compliance Fastest time to first audit-ready on this list 4.8/5
Scrut Automation SMB compliance automation Multi-framework compliance at a lower price point than Vanta 4.9/5
Thoropass Guided compliance + services Embedded compliance advisors paired with the software 4.7/5
Hyperproof GRC program management Deep control management for multi-framework, multi-business-unit programs 4.5/5
OneTrust Enterprise GRC + privacy GRC, privacy, and data governance in one platform 4.4/5
Optro (formerly AuditBoard) Mature GRC teams Enterprise audit workflow management for regulated industries 4.6/5
Scytale AI Lean team compliance Fast setup with startup-accessible pricing 4.8/5

1. Iru

  • Best for: IT and security teams that manage compliance alongside device and identity management
  • G2 rating: 4.7/5

Iru unifies endpoint management, identity governance, and compliance evidence in a single platform, connected through a shared AI layer. This reduces the need to move data between separate systems and helps ensure that device, identity, and compliance signals align in real-time.

Compliance automation in Iru is driven by an agentic system that builds and maintains the compliance program rather than simply tracking it. The platform generates framework-specific control sets based on an organization's tech stack, risk profile, and selected standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ISO 42001. Each framework is modeled independently to prevent overlap or cascading changes across certifications, while controls continuously update as systems, configurations, and access policies change.

Artifact Relevancy validates whether collected evidence maps correctly to its intended control and flags mismatches before they surface in audits. This helps maintain continuous audit readiness as underlying systems evolve, strengthening both internal compliance assurance and external audit trust.

This unified approach makes Iru a strong choice for IT and security teams that need compliance workflows to stay tightly connected with device and identity management as their environments evolve.

Features:

  • AI-Tailored Controls: Adapts control requirements to the organization's environment and compliance goals, reducing the burden of ongoing maintenance as systems, policies, and framework scope change.
  • Task-Based Readiness: Automatically builds and assigns compliance tasks with role-based ownership recommendations. A centralized readiness view replaces spreadsheet-based tracking and reduces manual coordination ahead of audits.
  • Artifact Relevancy: Continuously validates whether collected evidence maps correctly to each control. Mismatches are flagged before audit review, reducing remediation work and last-minute rework.
  • Trust Center: A customer-facing portal for sharing compliance posture with auditors and prospects. Includes NDA gating, request workflows, and access controls to manage security reviews without manual document exports.
  • Platform integration: Compliance Automation shares a data layer with Endpoint Management and Workforce Identity, allowing device posture and access signals to flow directly into compliance evidence without separate tool handling.

2. Drata

  • Best for: Fast-growing companies prioritizing automation depth and integration breadth
  • G2 rating: 4.7/5

Drata is a compliance automation platform designed for fast-growing companies, from startups to enterprises. Like Vanta, it helps organizations achieve and maintain certifications through automated evidence collection, control monitoring, and audit preparation workflows. However, Drata approaches compliance automation with a stronger emphasis on automation depth and operational efficiency.

The platform automates evidence collection across 250+ integrations and continuously monitors connected systems for compliance-related issues, such as configuration drift and missing security controls. It supports major compliance frameworks and includes vendor risk management, user access reviews, policy management, and built-in auditor collaboration workflows that consolidate evidence exchange and audit preparation in a single interface.

One operational difference is testing frequency. Drata runs daily automated tests, while Vanta runs hourly checks. For teams that prioritize streamlined compliance operations over near real-time monitoring, Drata's daily testing cadence may be a practical fit while still helping maintain audit readiness.

Features:

  • Automated evidence collection across 250+ integrations: Collects evidence directly from connected systems on a scheduled cadence, reducing manual uploads and spreadsheet-based tracking.
  • Continuous monitoring with daily automated tests: Runs automated checks across integrated systems and surfaces control failures before they escalate into audit issues.
  • Vendor risk management: Centralizes third-party risk tracking within the compliance program, aligning vendor oversight with internal controls and evidence workflows.
  • User access reviews: Structures access review cycles within the platform and links them directly to compliance controls, reducing manual coordination across teams.
  • Policy management and audit-ready reporting: Centralizes policy documentation and generates auditor-ready reports, reducing manual formatting and evidence preparation work.

3. Secureframe

  • Best for: SMBs completing a first SOC 2 or ISO 27001 without a dedicated GRC function
  • G2 rating: 4.7/5

Secureframe is a compliance automation platform designed for teams working toward their first security certification. It's often used by smaller organizations without a dedicated GRC team and focuses on reducing setup complexity for frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS.

The software connects to 300+ integrations and automates evidence collection across connected systems. It includes pre-built framework templates and control libraries that reduce the effort required to build a compliance program. An integrated auditor portal supports collaboration by keeping evidence and controls accessible within the platform.

Secureframe prioritizes simplicity in setup and ongoing use. It's solid for teams completing initial certifications, but may not be as well-suited for organizations that need higher-frequency monitoring or more advanced automation as programs scale.

Features:

  • 300+ integrations with automated evidence collection: Connects to cloud infrastructure, SaaS applications, and internal systems and automatically collects evidence, replacing manual gathering and spreadsheet-based tracking.
  • Pre-built SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS frameworks: Provides ready-to-use control libraries and templates that reduce setup time for new compliance programs.
  • Auditor portal for in-platform collaboration: Enables auditors to access evidence and controls directly within the platform, reducing external document sharing and audit coordination.
  • Policy and procedure templates: Offers configurable policy templates that accelerate documentation creation during early-stage compliance setup.
  • Continuous compliance monitoring: Runs automated checks across connected systems to identify control issues before audit cycles begin.

4. Sprinto

  • Best for: Early-stage startups completing a first audit on a short timeline
  • G2 rating: 4.8/5

Sprinto is built for startups and early-stage companies that need to achieve compliance quickly. It emphasizes rapid implementation, lower onboarding costs, and a streamlined path to SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification with minimal configuration.

Sprinto connects to 200+ integrations and automates evidence collection across commonly used SaaS and cloud environments. It focuses on the most widely adopted frameworks for B2B companies, including GDPR and HIPAA.

Compared to more configurable platforms, Sprinto prioritizes simplicity. The platform supports a narrower set of frameworks, runs automated checks twice daily, and limits advanced customization across control modeling and device-level governance. These tradeoffs reduce implementation complexity and ongoing management overhead, making it an ideal fit for teams not yet operating a full GRC program.

Features:

  • Automated evidence collection across 200+ integrations: Automatically collects evidence from SaaS, cloud infrastructure, and internal systems.
  • SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR framework coverage: Provides pre-built control libraries for the most commonly adopted compliance frameworks in early-stage B2B environments.
  • Guided onboarding and compliance setup: Reduces configuration effort and helps teams reach audit readiness faster with step-by-step setup guidance and structured workflows.
  • Automated employee compliance tracking: Tracks access provisioning, policy acknowledgments, and security training completion to support compliance evidence requirements.
  • Auditor-ready evidence formatting: Structures evidence to simplify audit reviews and reduce manual preparation work.

5. Scrut Automation

  • Best for: SMBs that need multi-framework compliance without enterprise pricing
  • G2 rating: 4.9/5

Scrut Automation is designed for SMB and mid-market teams that need to manage multiple compliance frameworks without adopting enterprise GRC platforms. It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA through automated evidence collection, integrated risk management, and vendor risk workflows in a single system.

The Scrut automation platform consolidates compliance activities across frameworks so teams can reuse controls and evidence rather than rebuilding them for each certification. Risk tracking and vendor assessments are managed in the same workflow, so teams don't have to coordinate across separate tools.

Scrut supports fewer third-party integrations and a smaller set of auditor partnerships than a lot of competitors, and seems to prioritize cost efficiency and simpler program setup, so organizations with highly customized compliance structures or complex audit environments may need more configuration control than it offers.

Features:

  • Multi-framework compliance automation: Supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA within a unified system, allowing teams to manage multiple certifications without duplicating control setup.
  • Automated evidence collection and control mapping: Pulls evidence from connected systems and maps it directly to controls across frameworks.
  • Integrated risk management: Maintains risk tracking alongside compliance activities within the same workflow.
  • Vendor risk management: Centralizes third-party assessments within the compliance program.
  • Compliance dashboard and audit reporting: Provides real-time status visibility and generates audit-ready reports within the platform.

6. Thoropass

  • Best for: Teams that want compliance software plus embedded expert guidance
  • G2 rating: 4.7/5

Thoropass (formerly Laika) combines compliance automation with embedded access to compliance specialists. It’s made for teams without in-house GRC expertise that need guidance integrated into the compliance workflow rather than separate consulting support.

It supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS through automated evidence collection, policy management, and auditor collaboration tools. Customers are paired with compliance advisors who work through the certification process alongside the software, supporting setup, evidence review, and audit preparation.

Thoropass's biggest differentiator is its managed services approach. Teams receive hands-on guidance from compliance specialists throughout implementation and audit preparation instead of navigating the certification process entirely on their own. For organizations without dedicated GRC expertise, that added support can be a worthwhile tradeoff, even if it means fewer integrations and less flexibility than some self-service platforms.

Features:

  • SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS automation: Provides pre-built control frameworks and automated evidence collection across major compliance standards.
  • Embedded compliance advisor support: Connects teams with in-house compliance specialists who guide the certification process alongside the software.
  • Automated evidence collection and policy management: Collects compliance evidence from integrated systems and centralizes policy documentation for audit readiness.
  • Auditor network and collaboration workflows: Supports direct collaboration with auditors and manages evidence exchange within the platform.
  • Continuous compliance monitoring:Tracks control status across connected systems and flags issues before they impact audit outcomes.

7. Hyperproof

  • Best for: Mid-market and enterprise teams managing complex, multi-framework GRC programs
  • G2 rating: 4.5/5

Hyperproof is built for teams managing multiple compliance frameworks, business units, and ongoing governance programs. It's structured around continuous program management rather than audit preparation cycles, where controls, risks, and reporting are maintained throughout the year.

The tool supports control management, risk tracking, vendor assessments, policy management, and audit reporting across multiple frameworks. Controls can be reused across programs, and compliance activities are tracked continuously rather than assembled primarily during audit periods.

It works for organizations with established GRC processes that manage compliance as an ongoing internal program rather than a one-time certification milestone. Compared to more automation-first platforms, Hyperproof requires more configuration and manual workflow setup but gives teams greater control over how compliance programs are structured.

Features:

  • Multi-framework control management: Maps and manages shared controls across multiple frameworks in a single system, reducing duplication across compliance programs.
  • Risk register and tracking: Maintains a structured register that links risks to controls and compliance status within a single workflow.
  • Vendor risk management: Tracks third-party risk alongside internal compliance data, consolidating oversight of organizational risk exposure.
  • Policy management and version control: Centralizes policy documentation with version tracking to support ongoing governance and audit readiness.
  • Audit reporting and evidence management: Generates audit-ready reports and organizes evidence for review across multiple frameworks, reducing manual preparation effort.

8. OneTrust

  • Best for: Enterprise teams with GRC, privacy, and data governance requirements across multiple jurisdictions
  • G2 rating: 4.4/5

OneTrust is an enterprise governance platform that combines GRC, privacy management, and data governance. Use it at organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions, where compliance extends into privacy and broader regulatory obligations.

The program includes integrations across enterprise systems, a broad framework library, and configurable workflows for compliance and privacy operations. Its vendor risk management includes AI-assisted questionnaire processing, and its Trust Center supports large-scale external sharing of compliance and privacy documentation.

OneTrust is best suited for large organizations managing complex compliance, privacy, and regulatory requirements across multiple jurisdictions. Compared to simpler compliance automation platforms, it requires more configuration and may be more than teams need when pursuing a single security certification.

Features:

  • GRC, privacy, and data governance in a unified platform: Combines compliance automation, privacy management, and data governance workflows for enterprise-scale regulatory coverage.
  • 100+ integrations with automated evidence collection: Connects to enterprise systems and SaaS tools to automatically collect compliance evidence across environments.
  • Multi-framework compliance coverage: Supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, and additional regulatory frameworks within a shared control environment.
  • AI-assisted vendor risk management: Streamlines third-party risk reviews using AI-assisted questionnaire processing and risk evaluation workflows.
  • Enterprise Trust Center: Provides a public-facing portal for sharing compliance and privacy posture, supporting external assurance requirements.

9. Optro

  • Best for: Enterprise GRC teams with structured internal audit programs in regulated industries
  • G2 rating: 4.6/5

Optro (formerly AuditBoard) is built for enterprise organizations running formal internal audit programs with defined cycles and structured approval workflows. It's a popular choice in industries like financial services and healthcare, where audit execution and documentation control are heavily regulated.

The platform supports audit management, risk tracking, control mapping, and compliance workflows. Teams use it to plan, execute, and document audits as part of recurring review cycles across the organization.

Optro centers audit execution rather than continuous compliance monitoring. It isn’t designed for real-time evidence collection across connected systems and typically requires configuration to align workflows with internal audit processes.

This makes Optro a solid fit for organizations with established audit teams and recurring review processes than teams looking for automated, always-on compliance monitoring.

Features:

  • Audit management and workflow execution: Manages audit cycles with task assignment, approvals, and sign-off tracking.
  • Risk tracking and registers: Connects risks to audit findings and control status.
  • Cross-framework control mapping: Links controls across frameworks to reduce duplication.
  • Compliance reporting and dashboards: Provides standardized reporting and dashboards for audit oversight.
  • Vendor risk management workflows: Supports structured third-party risk assessments within broader audit and compliance processes.

10. Scytale

  • Best for: Lean teams at early-stage companies building a first compliance program
  • G2 rating: 4.8/5

Scytale is a compliance automation platform that focuses on reducing setup complexity and accelerating time to audit readiness for organizations without in-house GRC expertise.

Scytale supports SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA with automated evidence collection, pre-built control frameworks, and an integrated auditor collaboration portal. Its onboarding flow helps minimize initial configuration, helping teams move quickly from setup to audit preparation.

Compared to more established platforms, Scytale connects to a smaller set of third-party systems and executes less frequent automated checks across those connections. And since it prioritizes fast implementation and straightforward setup over continuous monitoring and extended configuration options, it's a strong option for teams focused on reaching their early audit milestones, but less appropriate for organizations that need ongoing validation of controls across a growing and changing environment.

Features:

  • SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and HIPAA framework coverage: Provides pre-built control libraries for commonly required certifications.
  • Automated evidence collection and mapping: Collects evidence from connected systems and maps it directly to controls, reducing manual tracking during initial audit preparation.
  • Auditor collaboration portal: Enables auditors to review evidence within the platform, replacing email-based evidence exchange.
  • Compliance dashboard and readiness tracking: Provides a centralized view of compliance status and audit readiness milestones.
  • Structured onboarding for first-time compliance programs: Helps teams without prior GRC experience configure and launch a compliance program via guided workflows.

How to choose the right Vanta alternative

The best alternative to Vanta depends on where your compliance program has outgrown Vanta and what it requires to operate effectively. To find the best compliance automation solution, start by naming specific gaps in your current tool. Some key factors to consider include:

  • Continuous compliance and audit readiness: Keeps controls and evidence continuously updated so the program stays audit-ready rather than preparing in a sprint before each audit
  • Evidence quality and accuracy: Validates evidence to ensure it correctly maps to controls and stays current as systems change, reducing cleanup before audits.
  • Control management across frameworks: Covers multiple frameworks with consistent control mapping and minimal duplication or conflict between them.
  • Automated evidence collection: Pulls evidence directly from connected systems rather than relying on manual uploads or spreadsheet workflows.
  • Audit prep workload: Reduces last-minute cleanup, rework, and manual validation in the weeks before an audit.
  • Workflow and ownership clarity: Assigns compliance tasks, tracks progress, and establishes clear ownership across the team.
  • Integrations with your stack: Connects to the cloud providers, identity tools, endpoints, and SaaS applications the program needs to cover.
  • Audit sharing and external visibility: Makes evidence accessible to auditors and provides secure access to compliance documentation for security reviews.

Choose Iru when your compliance program needs device and identity management, too

When teams rely on separate tools for endpoint, identity, and compliance management, the manual reconciliation often becomes apparent during audits, when gaps are found on a time crunch.

Iru can help you consolidate those workflows into a single system, and keep device, identity, and compliance signals continuously aligned so audit readiness reflects the actual state of your environment rather than a point-in-time reconstruction.