Skip to content

Intune pricing: What your bundled MDM is actually costing you

Nathan Sparks Nathan Sparks
Intune pricing: What your bundled MDM is actually costing you

You didn't specifically choose Intune. It came bundled with your E3 or E5 agreement. It was a free line item sitting next to the productivity suite your org/company actually signed up for. So you started using it, because that's what "free" does: becomes the default before anyone really evaluates it.

A few months in, the cost is obvious to you even if it's invisible to your CFO. You know what’s coming if you try to bring in something different: “Why would we pay for something we already have?”

If you're the person who has to get the finance team’s buy-in, this post is for you. It covers the real costs of running Intune, and how to help your CFO understand them.

Where the cost actually accumulates

Every device management platform has two costs: what you pay for it, and what it costs you to operate it. A free tool doesn’t mean free to operate. The administrative overhead attached to Intune comes in many ways.

Third-party app patching becomes your job

Intune handles Microsoft's own applications and OS updates competently. Anything outside its Enterprise App Management catalog, itself a paid add-on, is all on you . That means building the Win32 package, testing it, deploying it, and doing it again the moment a new version drops. And, that’s if you have purchased the Enterprise App management catalog add-on.

Without that add-on, there's no shortcut. Chrome or Zoom alone update often enough to make this a standing chore rather than an occasional one.

And you're not ‘paying’ for this once. It’s every release cycle, in hours a dedicated patching tool would just handle.

You’re left waiting for payloads to land

This is a common complaint we hear. You push a policy or app change, and then you wait (and wait and wait) Intune's estimated maintenance check-in runs roughly every 8 hours, though some changes trigger a faster push notification. The real friction though is the visibility challenge: no clean per-device view of what's landed, what's pending, and what has silently failed. That gap means real hours spent chasing deployment status, and the real risk that a device drifts out of compliance before anyone catches it.

You’re continuously context switching

Full protection isn’t just with Intune, EDR and Vulnerability Management come with Microsoft Defender, another package with its own console. Finding an issue in one tool and deploying the fix in another means constant switching, and that switching cost is real even though it never appears on an invoice.

Why "we already have it" doesn't hold up

The pushback from finance is predictable: why pay for something we already have? It's a fair question if Intune's cost really were zero.

It isn't. It's just paid in a different currency: admin hours on manual patching, add-on licenses to close the gaps, and risk sitting in every device that can't be confidently confirmed compliant.

Laid out like this (hours per week, add-on spend, exposure) the conversation stops being "why replace something that’s free" and becomes "why are we paying for this in labor instead of a tool built for it."

Replace labor with automation

Iru eliminates the administrative burden through intelligent automations. We bring device management and security within the same console, with device check-ins every 15 minutes. You get a clear timeline of when patches land, whether a machine got the required patch, missed the deadline, or failed with an error. Plus, our extensive Auto App catalog comes packaged with Endpoint, for fully automated patching of more than 450+ applications without any of the manual work.

Device management should reduce operational load, not generate it. If you’re working on the case for a new device management solution, talk to us. We can help you put real figures against your own fleet.

Build your business case. Book a demo of Iru and let’s talk.

Recent Articles

Featured image: PamStealer comes to Intel Macs: Analyzing the x86_64 build of a Rust macOS stealer
Cristian Molina • 17 min read

PamStealer comes to Intel Macs: Analyzing the x86_64 build of a Rust macOS stealer

In late August 2026, automated telemetry identified an in-the-wild sample of PamStealer , an emerging Rust-based macOS information stealer first documented by Jamf Threat Labs . Prior public analysis observed PamStealer operating exclusively as an Apple Silicon (arm64) payload delivered via trojanized disk images impersonating the Maccy clipboard utility. This analyzed artifact is the Intel (x86_64) architecture slice of a multi-architecture fat binary, confirming that the threat actors have expanded their build pipeline to ensure uniform execution across legacy and modern Apple hardware.

Threat Intelligence
Featured image: Inside MSP Billing: What actually happens to your margin, day by day
Gregory Rogers • 5 min read

Inside MSP Billing: What actually happens to your margin, day by day

There's one number that decides whether your MSP business makes money: the spread. What you pay for your technology and what you charge your clients. The gap between the two is your entire business.

Product News
Featured image: Introducing macOS LAPS in Iru: Secure, automated local admin passwords
Mike Boylan • 4 min read

Introducing macOS LAPS in Iru: Secure, automated local admin passwords

Local administrator accounts are indispensable for troubleshooting and recovery, but the passwords behind them can also become a serious security liability. Shared credentials, long or nonexistent rotation intervals, and inconsistent storage practices give attackers more time and opportunity to move laterally after a compromise.

Product News

See Iru in action

Discover why thousands of teams choose Iru

By submitting this form I agree to Iru’s Privacy Policy and consent to be contacted by Iru about its products and services.

Stay up to date

Iru's bi-weekly collection of articles, videos, and research to keep IT & Security teams ahead of the curve.