Learn more about Iru vs. Jamf
Managing Apple in isolation creates fragmentation as environments grow. Jamf locks teams into Apple-only tools. Iru delivers cross-platform control, identity, and AI compliance.
Learn more about Iru vs. Jumpcloud
Directory-first platforms limit endpoint depth. JumpCloud covers identity and light MDM, but lacks automation and security. Iru delivers endpoint protection and AI compliance.
Learn more about Iru vs. Intune
Windows-first design creates friction for modern Mac teams. Intune forces workarounds and compliance gaps. Iru delivers best-in-class Apple support, identity, and AI security.
Learn more about Iru vs. NinjaOne
IT ticketing platforms aren’t security platforms. NinjaOne relies on add-ons for protection and compliance. Iru delivers unified device security, identity, and AI compliance.
Learn more about Iru vs. Mosyle
Tools built for education and small teams fall short at scale. Mosyle offers basic Apple management. Iru delivers cross-platform support, identity, and AI compliance automation.
Learn more about Iru vs. Addigy
Manual Apple management doesn’t scale to enterprise security. Addigy leaves threat detection and compliance fragmented. Iru delivers automated security and continuous compliance.
Learn more about Iru vs. Rippling
Stop struggling with an HR-first product and limited controls. Iru delivers stronger security, more automated IT, and robust management of devices, users, and apps.
Learn more about Iru vs. Fleet Device Management
GitOps-first MDM trades platform depth for engineer workflows. Fleet leaves patching, EDR, and compliance to your team. Iru delivers GitOps workflows, automated endpoint security, and AI compliance.
Learn more about Iru vs. CrowdStrike
Dedicated threat tools add administrative overhead. Iru brings device security and management into one lightweight agent, with a focused UI built for lean IT teams.
Learn more about Iru vs. SentinelOne
Standalone threat protection tools lack device management capabilities. Iru brings device security and management into a single agent, with security backed by our leading in-house research team.
Learn more about Iru vs. Hexnode
Tiered UEM puts core controls behind upgrades. Hexnode buries settings in submenus, which invites misconfigurations. Iru delivers every capability on every plan, with deep desktop and mobile controls and prebuilt automations.
Learn more about Iru vs. Google Workspace
Productivity suites weren’t built to govern access. Google Workspace needs specialized admins and relies on the browser for device trust. Iru automates groups, passwordless SSO, and posture checks at every login.
Learn more about Iru vs. Okta
Enterprise identity comes with enterprise cost and complexity. Okta charges a premium for depth most lean teams don’t need. Iru pairs passwordless SSO with native device trust, at a fraction of the price.
Learn more about Iru vs. Vanta
Vanta relies on a library of pre-written tests and out-of-the-box controls, and leaves off at evidence collection. Iru customizes controls to reflect the nuance of how you operate, while enforcing controls in the same platform.
Learn more about Iru vs. Drata
Drata gives every customer the same control catalogue and retests controls against fixed baselines. Iru customizes controls to reflect how your business operates, and continuously checks evidence and controls for drifts
Learn more about Iru vs. Microsoft Defender
Running security and management in separate consoles causes policy conflicts. Defender splits EDR from device management, so settings drift between them. Iru unifies EDR, patching, and management in one agent and one console.
Learn more about Iru vs. Omnissa Workspace One
Device coverage shouldn’t depend on which tier you pay for. Workspace ONE puts key capabilities behind higher tiers and takes specialists to run. Iru includes every capability on every plan, with prebuilt automations that replace custom builds.