Skip to content

Compliance Automation momentum: new frameworks and industry recognition

Iru Team Iru Team
Compliance Automation momentum: new frameworks and industry recognition

As of this week, Iru Compliance Automation supports three new frameworks: CMMC, NIST SP 800-171, and ISO 27701. These frameworks join the others within Iru Compliance Automation today (SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, HIPAA, NIST 800-53, and NIST CSF 2.0), bringing the total to ten.

And with these additions, your coverage now extends meaningfully into defense contracting, federal supply chain security, and global privacy compliance. Here’s what each of these new frameworks supports, and how Iru Compliance Automation can help your organization with each:

CMMC: Certification that defense contractors can no longer defer

The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification is the U.S. Department of Defense's framework for protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) across the defense industrial base. What makes CMMC different from its predecessors is the shift from self-attestation to third-party certification, and the enforcement mechanism attached to it. Without the right CMMC level, you cannot bid on or hold DoD contracts.

CMMC is structured across three maturity levels. Level 1 covers basic cyber hygiene. Level 2, where most defense contractors with CUI obligations land,maps directly to NIST SP 800-171's 110 security requirements. Level 3 adds requirements on top of that for organizations handling the most sensitive programs.

For GRC teams in the defense industrial base, the challenge has never been understanding the requirements. It's been demonstrating continuous compliance to auditors. That calls for device-level evidence, at scale, collected automatically. A spreadsheet assembled before an assessment doesn't hold up the way it used to.

Iru's endpoint data provides a strong, continuously updated evidence layer for applicable requirements. Device check-ins, applied policies, and configurations are recorded continuously and mapped to the applicable CMMC controls.

NIST SP 800-171: The technical baseline behind federal procurement

NIST 800-171 defines 110 security requirements for protecting CUI in non-federal information systems. If CMMC Level 2 is the certification, NIST 800-171 is the technical standard it's built on. NIST 800-171 is the backbone.

But NIST 800-171 shows up in places beyond CMMC. Federal agencies include it in contract clauses. Research institutions, universities, and manufacturers with federal contracts may encounter it in procurement contexts where a formal CMMC audit may not be required.

The 110 requirements span access control, incident response, configuration management, audit logging, and more — all areas where endpoint posture is either the primary control or the evidence source for it. Teams that have been managing these requirements manually, through policy documents and point-in-time assessments, are increasingly being asked to demonstrate continuous compliance rather than snapshot compliance.

Iru's Adaptive Evidence Map solves exactly that. It’s evidence from your endpoints, identity, and security tooling is collected continuously, timestamped, and mapped to NIST 800-171 requirements, so you're presenting, not reconstructing, your compliance history.

ISO 27701: A structured framework for managing personal data

Originally a privacy extension to ISO 27001, ISO 27701 is now a standalone framework. This standard defines requirements for a Privacy Information Management System, covering how personal data is collected, processed, stored, and transferred.

Its practical value is twofold. First, it provides a structured framework for organizations that need to demonstrate accountability under GDPR, CCPA, or other regional data protection regimes, without building a compliance program from scratch for each regulation. Second, for organizations already certified to ISO 27001, bridging into ISO 27701 is significantly more efficient than it would be starting from zero because the management system foundations from ISO 27001 are already in place.

Organizations that act as both data controllers and data processors, holding customer data while also processing it on behalf of others, face accountability obligations from multiple directions. ISO 27701 gives them a single framework to demonstrate that they've addressed both.

For organizations already running ISO 27001 in Iru, that foundation carries forward automatically. Controls are scoped to your role as a controller, processor, or both, adjusted to your regions of operation, and built on top of your existing ISMS evidence.

Additional frameworks deliver a compounding advantage

Adding a new framework in Iru doesn't mean starting over. Iru already knows your business — your devices, your identity posture, your policies, your existing control evidence. When you map to a new framework, that organizational context carries forward automatically. Controls that already satisfy requirements in one framework satisfy overlapping requirements in the next. Evidence already being collected gets remapped, not recollected.

For GRC teams, that changes the math on every new regulatory requirement you face as your business expands. Instead of starting from scratch, you’re building off the hard work you’ve already done with a platform that is built on the same data layer as device management and identity. That’s the Iru advantage for compliance.


Furthermore, the market is recognizing our acceleration. This month, The Hacker News named Iru the Best Cybersecurity Compliance Company at the 2026 Cybersecurity Stars Awards.

The award recognizes something our customers already know: compliance built on the same data layer as endpoint management, identity, and vulnerability management operates differently than a standalone GRC tool. Evidence is always current. Control drift triggers remediation automatically. And Adaptive Compliance features help to ensure your compliance program stays aligned with how your organization operates.

winner-2026

What's available now

CMMC, NIST SP 800-171, and ISO 27701 are live in Iru Compliance Automation. If your organization is preparing for a CMMC audit, operating under federal contract, or extending an existing ISO 27001 program into privacy, you can begin mapping controls and collecting evidence in the same platform as your other frameworks today.

Learn more about Compliance Automation from Iru or book a demo to see it running live in your environment.

 

Recent Articles

Featured image: Apple beta testing and device management services: the perfect match
Mike Boylan 6 min read

Apple beta testing and device management services: the perfect match

Every fall, Apple’s newest operating systems arrive everywhere at once. That’s great for users, but it puts IT teams on the clock: they need to validate the release, find blockers, prepare their support teams, and decide when the business is ready to move.

Educational
Featured image: A representitive illustration of multiple laptops next to each other, representing endpoint security for Macs.
Iru Team 9 min read

Endpoint security for Mac: How to protect macOS at scale

Mac endpoint security combines built-in macOS protections with centralized tools that help you monitor devices, enforce policies, detect threats, and respond quickly across your entire fleet. Built-in macOS security features like Gatekeeper and XProtect provide a strong foundation, but they don't offer the visibility, automation, threat detection, or behavior detection needed to secure Mac devices at scale. Layering third-party tools such as endpoint management, endpoint detection and response (EDR), and vulnerability management closes those gaps. With Iru, you can manage and remediate your Mac fleet from a single AI-powered platform, giving your IT and security teams more time and control. Your Mac fleet grows one device at a time. Then, almost overnight, you're supporting remote employees, multiple offices, and hundreds of endpoints. At that point, endpoint security for Mac isn't just about protecting individual devices. It's about knowing what's happening across your entire environment.

Featured image: How a single PostScript file leaks your Mac's memory
Csaba Fitzl 8 min read

How a single PostScript file leaks your Mac's memory

When I started my InfoSec journey, most of the offensive classes I took focused on memory corruption exploits. I learned a lot about buffer overflows, DEP and ASLR bypasses, and even got into kernel exploitation. However, since my job at that time was mostly hunting for bad guys in an insane amount of logs and telemetry data, I never really had the time to apply this knowledge.

Threat Intelligence

See Iru in action

Discover why thousands of teams choose Iru

By submitting this form I agree to Iru’s Privacy Policy and consent to be contacted by Iru about its products and services.

Stay up to date

Iru's bi-weekly collection of articles, videos, and research to keep IT & Security teams ahead of the curve.